Omri Katz Net Worth 2026#5321 ACTORS

Actor

$0M
Likely $1.3M – $1.7M
Age50b. May 30, 1976
Active1983–2002
Main sourceActingfirst listed
Rank in field#5321of 5,712 actors
FromAmerican
Estimate, not a disclosed figureConfidence High(8/9 fields known)Band ±10%Last reviewed 30 July 2026How we estimate →

Where the money comes from

Acting · primaryresidualspossible investments

Listed in the order our sources give them; the first is treated as primary. We do not publish a percentage split — no public breakdown of this person’s income exists, and inventing one would be a guess.

Is $1.5M a lot? — against actors

Ranked #5321 of 5,712 actors we hold an estimate for.

Omri Katz is a name that resonates with many who grew up watching 1990s television. Best known for his role as Max Dennison in the cult classic film “Hocus Pocus,” Katz has been a notable figure in the entertainment industry since he was a child. As we look ahead to 2024, fans and financial enthusiasts alike may be curious about the net worth of this former child star. In this article, we will delve into Omri Katz’s net worth in 2024, exploring his career, investments, and the various factors that have contributed to his financial status.

Omri Katz’s financial journey began at a young age with his entry into the entertainment industry. His initial roles, particularly on the TV series "Dallas," laid the groundwork for his financial foundation. Over the years, his earnings from acting, investments, and other ventures have contributed to his overall net worth.

Estimating Omri Katz's net worth in 2024 involves analyzing his past acting income, residuals from his famous roles, and other possible sources of revenue. Although exact figures can be elusive, combining known information with industry standards provides a realistic financial picture.

Katz's most significant earnings likely came from his work on "Dallas" and "Hocus Pocus." Both projects enjoyed considerable success and have continued contributing to his financial portfolio.

While specific details about his investments aren't publicly known, it's common for celebrities to diversify their portfolios into real estate and stocks, which would have grown in value over time.

The enduring popularity of "Hocus Pocus" ensures that Katz continues to receive residuals, which are likely a vital component of his ongoing income.

Comparing Omri Katz's net worth to his earnings during his peak acting years provides valuable context. When adjusting for inflation, his past earnings demonstrate his enduring financial stability.

While specific details about Katz's approach to finance are not widely known, the successful management of his earnings and investments suggests a prudent financial philosophy.

When compared to contemporary actors of similar career trajectories, Katz's net worth is modest. However, it's crucial to account for the different paths taken by modern actors who leverage social media and diverse business ventures more extensively.

Compared to other 90s child stars, Katz’s financial standing may appear less prominent, but this is reflective of his career choices and lesser public exposure in recent years.

In conclusion, Omri Katz’s net worth in 2024 is a reflection of his early success as a child actor, his iconic role in “Hocus Pocus,” and his financial decisions post-retirement. While he may not be as active in the entertainment industry as he once was, his legacy, particularly with “Hocus Pocus,” continues to contribute to his financial standing. As we look to the future, any new projects or involvement in a potential sequel could further impact Omri Katz’s net worth. Regardless, his contributions to the film and television industry remain a cherished part of his fans’ memories and continue to influence his financial success.

AdvertisementIn-article · fluid
About this figureNet worth estimates on this site are compiled from public sources and comparable transactions. They are not audited, not confirmed by the subject, and will change. This page was last reviewed on 30 July 2026. Tell us if something is wrong.